High Strength EDDQ Sheet

Introduction.

Steel is the most important material in the automotive industry, since it fulfills a variety of requirements at relatively low costs. Fuel economy and safety factors demand higher strength steels. Other considerations regarding styling and ease of fabrication require sheet steel of extra deep drawing quality (EDDQ). As shown in figure 1 (1,2), most of the traditional methods of increasing the strength of automotive sheet also reduce the deep drawing properties (demonstrated by the Lankford value r) and the stretch formability (demonstrated by the strain hardening exponent n). However, high strength sheet with excellent formability has been developed based on interstitial free (IF) steel and this material is experiencing a steadily increasing demand.

The Market of IF steel

The possibility of improving the cold formability of sheet steel by using interstitial free steels has been well known for almost three decades (3). Starting in the early 1980's in Japan a remarkable growth in the production of IF steels was observed and the tonnage has more than doubled every three years. Similar trends have also been noted in other industrialized countries (1). This steady increase is continuing worldwide and the annual production reached about 15 million t in 1995. This remarkable development is supported by the fact that modern steel making technology via the RH degassing process, sometimes in combination with oxygen blowing, allows the mass production of steel with very low interstitial contents, with levels of carbon and nitrogen below 30 ppm for each interstitial element. Such low interstitial levels need comparably small additions of stabilizing elements, thus reducing the alloy costs in this steel type, but the breakthrough in the adoption of IF steels was mainly influenced by other factors:

1) The continuous annealing of sheet, which allows for time and cost savings to be made in comparison to the batch annealing process, has become more common. Furthermore, the more homogeneous conditions in this process reduce the variation in mechanical properties over the length and width of the sheet and also from coil to coil. However, the fast reheating velocity does not allow for the use of traditional AIN texture control technology resulting in insufficient formability of the traditional EDDQ steel composition. When using interstitial free steels an excellent Lankford value and also an improved stain hardening potential is obtained, independent, if the batch annealing or continuous annealing process is applied (4).

2) Continuous annealing is also the standard processing route in hot dip metallizing lines for coating steel sheet with zinc or other metals. The usage of such corrosion-resistant sheet products for the automotive industry is growing very rapidly and many new production lines have been installed worldwide. These lines do not normally allow for cementite precipitation after recrystallization (the so called overaging part in continuous annealing lines). Since the interstitial free condition guarantees naturally no aging, IF steels are therefore also favorable for galvanizing lines as well as for other strip processing routes.

3) Large integrated parts guarantee a remarkable increase in press shop productivity owing to reduced pressing and welding operations and allow savings of equipment. One reported example is a door link (5) where by using just one large sheet of IF steel with excellent deep drawing properties the conventional method of using six components could be replaced, thus reducing the costs for punch and dies by 20% on top of the higher productivity. The required formability of the sheet for such integrated parts can only be obtained by using IF steels.

Physical Metallurgy of IF steel

Figure 2 (6,7) exhibits that the Lankford value increases exponentially with lower carbon levels, a tendency which is enhanced by niobium-stabilization of the interstitials carbon and nitrogen. Thus the reduction in the level of the interstitials is of upmost relevance.

Up to the early 1980's standard steelmaking technology produced carbon levels of <80 ppm and nitrogen levels of <60 ppm, which then required large amounts of stabilizing elements. A typical IF steel at this time relied preferably on titanium stabilization and typical additions were as high as 0.12% (8). This decision was based on economical factors, since titanium has a more favorable atomic ratio Me/C than niobium and the titanium ferroalloy also costs less compared to niobium. With lower contents of interstitials these benefits for titanium decrease in significance.

Figure 3 demonstrates the precipitation start temperature of the compounds observed in modern IF steel, when the carbon content is either stabilized with titanium or with niobium. Titanium shows a high reactivity with all metalloids in the sequence oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, carbon and phosphorus. In a vacuum treated aluminum killed steel, the first compound which will be formed at high temperatures, i.e. during solidification or in the delta ferrite region, is the TiN. Then, dependent on the level of the total sulfur, titanium and manganese content often the formation of TiS might occur. The titaniumsulfide will be transformed into a titaniumcarbosulfide by absorbing carbon in the austenite region. This reaction has been studied in detail recently (9) and seems to have preference over the alternative possibility for the formation of MnS and TiC. Therefore in order to fully stabilize the carbon content by titanium at least the stoichiometric addition to fix nitrogen, sulfur and carbon is necessary. This can be calculated from the atomic weight ratios:

%Ti = 48/14 x %N + 48/32 x %S + 48/12 x %C (Equ. 1 )
In case of excess free titanium an iron-titanium-phosphide might be formed in the ferrite region.

When stabilizing the carbon content by niobium, the sulfur content will be fixed by manganese and the nitrogen by aluminum. Since both elements are already present in these steels, the required niobium level has to be just stoichiometric with respect to carbon.
%Nb = 93/12 x %C (Equ. 2)
NbC will be formed only during or after the g/a transformation according to the solubility product. If additional solute niobium is present, several benefits have been observed (9) and these studies are still continuing (10).
From calculations using typical contents of the relevant metalloids in modern IF steel, e.g. 30 ppm C, 35 ppm N and 80 ppm S it can be shown that at least 0.036% Ti or 0.023% Nb is needed in the steel to obtain the IF status. With this rather low amount of the necessary stabilizing elements, the alloy costs are low for both variants. Since various surface defects (blisters, slivers, streaky defects) are more pronounced with titanium levels higher than 0.025%, dual stabilization. i.e. fixing only the nitrogen by titanium and using niobium to stabilize the carbon, is gaining in importance.

Furthermore, the different behavior of titanium and niobium in forming compounds during hot strip rolling also has an influence on the final properties. In niobium stabilized steels a delay in recrystallization during the final deformation steps in the finishing stand of the hot strip mill (11) and a lower g/a transformation temperature of approximately 20oC at a typical cooling rate (12) are observed. Both observations
can be related to a solute drag effect of the relatively large niobium atom. Therefore more nuclei for ferrite formation are active resulting in a finer grain size. The finer grain size of the hot rolled band gives a higher
r value and a lower Dr value for a certain degree of cold rolling reduction (13). The high planar isotropy by the use of niobium in IF steel is known already, for some time (14) and it has the positive effect of reducing earing phenomena in EDDQ grades. Since the titanium stabilized material shows the higher elongation data, the best combination of cold forming properties is achieved with dual stabilization of low interstitial grades, as summarized in figure 4 (2).

High Strength IF or ULC steel

The tensile properties of interstitial free steels are rather low with a yield strength of around 150 MPa and a tensile strength of around 300 MPa. Based on the IF steel alloy concept, new ultra low carbon (ULC) high strength steel sheet with excellent deep drawing and stretch forming ability have been introduced into the market and actually steels with even higher strength than indicated in the figure 1 are under development. These steels do not always need to be interstitial free, therefore the term ULC is more correct.

The inherent finer grain size of a niobium stabilized hot band is passed on to a certain extent to the recrystallized annealed sheet, thus resulting in somewhat higher strength. This is one of the reasons that high strength ULC steels rely on niobium microalloying. Since good cold formability is possible only with fully recrystallized material and the kinetics of this process depend on the coarsening of the carbonitrides, the possibility of applying precipitation hardening by carbonitrides cannot be used to increase the strength in EDDQ steels. Therefore, solid solution hardening is used as a strengthening mechanism. Relevant elements in this context are manganese and silicon, which increase the tensile strength by 4 N/mm2 per 0.1% Mn or 10 N/mm2 per 0.1% Si. The effect of phosphorus is an order of magnitude greater, the tensile strength being increased by 100 N/mm2 per 0.1% P in niobium stabilized steels and slightly less in titanium steels, as shown in
figure 5 (15). The lower strengthening effect in the titanium steel can be explained by the formation of the FeTiP-phase, thus lowering the solution hardening effect of phosphorus. This is an additional reason, besides the finer grain size, for the use of niobium in preference to titanium for carbon stabilization.

One negative effect of phosphorus is its tendency to diffuse to the grain boundaries, causing embrittlement. This is particularly effective in interstitial free steels, where no carbon exists in the form of solute atoms, which could competitively occupy the grain boundaries and thus strengthen them. After batch annealing such embrittlement may be quite significant in IF steel without any extra phosphorus additions. The typical phosphorus content in the high strength EDDQ steels can cause grain boundary embrittlement even during the short continuous annealing cycle time. In order to avoid this, the addition of boron to the high strength ULC steels has become common practice (16).
Figure 6 shows results achieved with a specific impact test. Boron, which is also an interstitial element, appears to successfully prevent grain boundary segregation of phosphorus, and this effect is enhanced by the finer grain size (larger grain boundary area) when microalloying with niobium. Thus niobium helps to reduce the phosphorus embrittlement in addition to its strengthening effects.

When galvanizing or galvannealing is involved, the steel usually must not contain major additions of silicon.
Table 1 (15) shows characteristic production data of a hot dip galvanized high strength IF steel. indicating also the high planar isotropy of these steels.

Table 1: Chemical composition and mechanical properties of hot dip galvanized high strength IF steel

 

Chemical Composition

Mechanical Properties

  30 ppm C, 30 ppm N, Yield Strength 220 N/mm2
  0.35% Mn, 0.05% P, Tensile Strength 390 N/mm2
  0.03% Al, 0.035% Nb, Elongation A 80 37%
  0.02% Ti, 10 ppm B r-value 1.9
  D r-Value 0.1

 

n-value 0.21

The bake hardenability of sheet steel is very much appreciated by the automotive industry, since it allows the pressing with rather low forces and guarantees a higher strength in the final product. i.e. after press forming and paint baking. Bake hardening introduces the Cottrell effect of dislocation locking by interstitials and therefore the steel needs a certain amount of solute carbon, which should not be below 5 ppm (16). One possibility is to produce ultra low carbon steel with a slightly under-stoichiometric addition of the carbon-stabilizing elements. This approach needs very precise melting shop technology, especially since the carbon pick up between the vacuum treatment and the concast slab usually varies slightly. The process has one disadvantage, in that even such low levels of solute carbon which are present at the start of the continuous annealing process hamper the formation of a favorable texture for deep drawing and thus influence the r-value (17).

Figure 7 (18) illustrates schematically the processing route to obtain the extra yield strength increase of around 50 N/mm2 due to bake hardening of a high strength EDDQ sheet. The alloy design is based on complete carbon stabilization by niobium and after cold rolling the sheet exhibits an IF status. As already discussed earlier, the NbC is formed at fairly low temperatures, i.e. in the ferrite region. Thus it can be partially dissolved, if a rather high temperature in the continuous annealing process is applied, higher than necessary for the complete recrystallization of the cold rolled sheet. Fast cooling after this dissolution treatment guarantees, that a few ppm of carbon remain in solution causing bake hardenability. In this condition the steel does not exhibit a total interstitial free status, but the favorable texture for excellent cold formability is maintained.

Conclusions

Interstitial free steels have obtained a relevant market share in the recent years especially for the automotive industry, i.e. mainly continuously annealed EDDQ grade as galvanized or galvannealed sheet. Historically, titanium only was used for the stabilization of the interstitial elements due to economic reasons. With even lower carbon levels in modern IF steels this argument diminishes and dual stabilization with a combination of small additions of titanium stoichiometric to nitrogen and niobium stoichiometric to carbon now provides the best compromise with regard to cost, surface quality and formability.

Another requirement of the automotive industry is weight reduction, which demands for higher strength sheet material. Since most of the higher strength sheet steels exhibit a reduced formability, their application is restricted. Based on the ultra low carbon concept high strength extra deep drawing quality sheet steels have been developed, which also guarantee a high planar isotropy. Niobium stabilization has become standard in such high strength ULC sheet, owing to better properties and the possibility to apply bake hardening.

The versatility and the potential of the IF and ULC steels allow steel to maintain its position as the most economic.

References

  1. K. Hulka and F. Heisterkamp, Stahl und Eisen I 10 (1990), No. 9, p. 65-68
  2. H. Takechi, data presented in Diisseldorf, 1990, see reference 1.
  3. J.A. Elias and R.E. Hook, Mechanical Working and Steel Processing IX, TMS of AIME, New York (NY), 1970, p. 348-368
  4. H. J. Junius, W. Bleck, W. Müschenborn and C. Strabburger, Stahl und Eisen 108 (1988), No. 20, p. 931-938
  5. H. Takechi, Steel Today and Tomorrow, Oct.-Dec. 1994, p. 5-8
  6. W.B. Hutchinson and K. Ushida, Scand. J. Metall. 13, 1984, p. 269-275
  7. T. Obara, S. Satoh, M. Nishida and T. Irle, Int. Symp. on Cont. Annealing of Steel, Stockholm, 1984
  8. L. Meyer, 'Kontaktstudium Werkstoffkunde', Part 1, VDEh, Düsseldorf (Germany), 1982
  9. G. Tither, C.I. Garcia, M. Hua and A.J. DeArdo, Physical Metallurgy of IF Steels,
  10. ISIJ, Tokyo (Japan), 1994, p. 293-322 private communication with A.J. DeArdo, Sept. 1996
  11. Najafi-Zadeh, S. Yue and J.J. Jonas, ISIJ Int. 32 (1992), p. 213-221
  12. W. Bleck, R. Bode and F. J. Hahn, Thyssen Techn. Ber. 1/90, p. 69-85
  13. B. Hutchinson and E. Lindt, ibid. Ref. 9, p. 127-140
  14. T. Obara, S. Satoh, M. Nishida and T. Irie, paper pres. at "Int. Symp. on
  15. Cont. Annealed Steel", Stockholm (S), June 1984.
  16. L. Meyer, W. Bleck and W. Müschenborn, ibid. Ref. 9, p. 203-222
  17. P. Elsen and H.P. Hougardy, steel research 64 (1993), p. 431-436
  18. S. Satoh et al., Kawasaki Steel Techn. Rep., No. 27, 1992, p. 31-38
  19. M. Kurosawa, S. Satoh, T. Obara and K. Tsunoyama, Kawasaki Steel Techn. Rep. 18, 1988, p. 61-65
  20. Niobium Information No 12/96

Write to the Author

K. Hulka